Friday, 15 February 2008

  • Money doesn't make our world go round

    did we really say we were going to do one of these a week?
    drokk!

    Had a lot to do, mostly responding to what i’m writing about now, as it happens:
    ...money!
    Anyone in Britain will have heard plenty about Arts Funding over he last few weeks - sorry, here’s some more...

    We’ve recently  found out that we didn’t get an Arts Council grant this year, even though we were hoping for one and put some serious work in on an application. We’re not a ‘regularly funded organisation’ (the ones you’ve maybe been reading about) which means we hadn’t been told we’d definitely get money; as it is, the message was “perfectly good ideas, guys, it’s just we don’t have enough money to support you this year”. No-one in Britain needs to be told, either, that (despite more money than was expected in the Arts Council allocation from Government, and despite promises not to pour any more of it into a black hole in East London) a lot of Arts Funding has been corralled by those extraordinary people who administer sports events, for a certain way-over-budget event in 2012.

    What’s more of a wrench is that we’re staring down the barrel of a massive cut in what we get from the local council here in Bath: in big figures they were saying they were likely to give us about the same amount of money for the whole of the next three years as they did in total in 2007: ie. that cut us by two-thirds. If you compare that with what they gave us in 2006 it’s down to something like 28%.

    OK, it's still possible it's not going to be that bad, we hear that not everyone in the council is happy with the suggestion, but we're going to get cut by a big chunk. Everyone's going to get cut and we're not a priority. Nothing like a priority. Not even like some other 'cultural' organisations you could name. We find out how bad it is soon. We'll tell you when we know - unless we've got complaining-fatigue by that point.

    I’m not going to argue the reasons here: the council can give money to who it likes, they’ve got less of it over the years (and no it’s not because they gave it all to Thermae Bath Spa) and they’ve got priorities and protocols and targets and the like that tell them what to think.

    People who live round here should be told that this puts at risk lots of stuff we have usually spent their money on: printing the programme that advertises things that everyone else puts on; giving money to the FAB Visual Arts programme (locally created free events in unusual places) when no-one else does; putting things on for free in public places; and running our office that makes all those things and a lot else happen when no-one else can be bothered. That includes paying our two “part-time” workers and some contracted help, so i expect i should declare an interest.

    If the council wants to, they’re free to tell us that they don’t want to support that sort of thing; if you’re bothered by that, you have a vote and perhaps one of the parties could put arts & culture funding on their manifesto (this is supposed to be an arty city but it’s apparently more interested in shopping).

    What this means is: anything free we put on this year for people in general (you guys) is going to be there because of our sponsors and supporters (not everyone thinks we’re doing it wrong); we’re going to try and do something on Kensington Meadows but it’s not going to have any seed money, so it’s likely to have a gate tax on it; and some things we charge for (like programme entry, which is waaay cheaper than Brighton, Buxton or Edinburgh) are going to have to go up a bit. And then probably a bit more. The money the council gives us will go an some very specific things they’ve selected: it’s all stuff we want to do, but it’s outside the remit of what we’ve been accustomed to put on for you. Priorities, you see...

    Actually, this could mean more fun in the long run

    • Council-sponsored art has never been known for - umm, how can we put this? - it’s never been known for taking the right kind of risks; we’re probably better without them breathing down our necks. At the moment, apart from Suited & Booted, the youth film crew, I can’t think of anything that I’ve been to from one of the other locally subsidised ‘agencies’ that I’ve enjoyed - and no, Cynthia, that’s not because I don’t like innovation, my tastes in experimental performance and abstract music are well leftfield of most people I know - it’s because they haven’t been any good.

    • We’re still going to be doing stuff for free in the streets and elsewhere, that’s the way we like it and that’s the way it works best. Luckily our sponsors - and very probably the Arts Council in another year, and very probably some other institutions who like what we do and, even better, like the things we’re planning - can connect with that idea, even though they can’t get it to fill in a questionnaire.

    • The things we want to develop for the future, the big ideas we’d really like to see, are way out of the budget range of things the council supports unless you happen to be Bath Festival, and some of them aren’t the sort of thing the Arts Council pays for without you already having a reputation for doing them - but there are other people who might take a punt on it earlier on. It’s the big, mad and one-off ideas that keep us interested, and they're as difficult, or as easy, as they’ve ever been. We’ve got reams of them, we suspect you’d really like to see them when they happen, and we’re going out to look for support for them in the country beyond the focus group where things are more interesting. 

    We only ever got involved in state funding because
    • we were doing things that they said they wanted to happen
    • and because there were other things they said they wanted to happen that we happened to think we were the best people to do.
    We’re not looking to add to the increase of arts bureaucracies, we’re a Fringe and Fringe comes from the artists and the audiences rather than the bureaucrats.

    They’re probably doing us a favour.
    It's just not the most obvious interpretation from here.

  • Choose Identity

  • Give eProps (?)

  • New! You can now edit your comments for 15 minutes after submitting.

Who recommended?